Mindset Bests Skill Set

Mindset Bests Skill Set

Mindset Bests Skill Set

I have been thinking quite a bit about yesterday’s post.  While true, just being open will help opportunities come, there has to be something more to  success.  Especially when it comes to financial independence, it is tempting to believe that passivity will win the day.  After all, our best investment vehicle is the passive index fund.  Yet, we struggle to create a path to financial freedom paved with good habits and a stack of talents evolved through years of learning.  But talent is not enough.  In my humble opinion, mindset bests skill set every time.

Although this idea may seem simplistic, I think it holds water.  Skills come and go, but it is the way in which we approach the hurdles that predefines the outcome

Limiting beliefs

Ultimately, training and education only get one so far.  No matter how well prepared for a task, success is quite illusive if the probability of failure seems high.  This is the realm of limiting beliefs.  Often tasks are either never attempted or given minimal mental energy if already stowed comfortably in the unlikely box.

Conversely, if one is willing to trash their limiting beliefs, the road to obtain the necessary education and training seems rather manageable.  This is true for just about anything from learning to ride a bicycle to becoming a doctor.  Although some skills may take longer to acquire than others, the most difficult transition is often the first step.

Mindset bests skill set.  Every time.

What I'll Miss Most

The Fallacy of the Talent Stack

The problem is that skills are fungible.  In this ever-changing world, one’s highly specialized abilities may prove worthless in the near future.  Creative destruction, technology, outsourcing.  One never knows when ones skill set will become outdated or the need for certain abilities quickly turn extinct.

There is absolutely no way to be able to foretell the future.  Even my role as a doctor may be usurped by technology, machines, or lower paid employees.  The only thing that doesn’t change is the process of change itself.

Overly investing in the talent stack may eventually lead to destitution and failure.

Mindset bests skill set.  The manner by which a problem is approached and solved will always be more important than the tools actually used to solve said problem.

The Growth Mindset

Tenants of the growth mindset believe that intelligence can be developed, and that we can get smarter with hard work.  Notice how I didn’t use the term more able.

When we build our talent stack we do good things.  We become more able.  But we don’t necessarily become smarter.  To rely on our skills only would allow us to become masters.  Not necessarily innovators.  This is the fixed mindset.

When I went to medical school I was building my talent stack.  I was developing a skill set, and working towards mastery.  This was all good, but it in no way prepared me for the topsy-turvy environment that healthcare had become.

By becoming a medical director of nursing homes, opening a concierge practice, and uncoupling my revenue streams from Medicare, I was using the growth mindset.  I was pivoting, and opening myself up to the opportunities that came my way.

I would have never thrived if I had relied only on those abilities I had developed in medical school

Mindset bests skill set.

Final Thoughts

Skills are important.  Training and education are priceless.  Yet, they are not enough.

Success comes from having the right mindset.

Mindset bests skill set.

Doc G

A doctor who discovered the FI community but still struggling with RE.

You may also like...

8 Responses

  1. Bill Yount says:

    Growing your mindset breeds flexibility in a rapidly changing environment. It is a leadership mentality. Skillsets are critical tools that a growth minset leader wields, but does not have to personally master. Skillsets come and go. Fundamentally they are finite and replaceable. Minsets are infinite and scalable. I like tge way your mindset works!;)

  2. Gasem says:

    What if you could move from hand waving to an actual numeric analysis? This is the domain of Bayesian statistics. Bayesian is how your life is being controlled. You mention to your wife you read about the White House Christmas tree and suddenly 200 adds and articles pop up on your phone displaying Christmas tree information in some distribution designed to get you to click.

    Bayesian analysis also can be used by you to numerically determine when “enough” is. You claimed “passive funds” are best but then construct your portfolio on a bogglehead 3 model based on some faulty bogglehead analysis of “diversity”. If WR=4%, a BH3 for 30 years has a 86.87% chance of survival (assuming normal inflation and SORR). A 50/50 VTSMX:VBMFX at 4% WR has a 98.3% survival for 30 years, same 30 year retirement, same 40K per year withdrawal, same 1M portfolio to start all other parameters the same. Clearly if you’re invested in a BH3, 1M to start is not enough. 1/8 chance of survival is not good enough. You need a side gig to pay for your added risk. If you’re invested 50/50 you have enough no side gig necessary. 98 times out of 100 you’re golden and all you did was reduce your risk.

  3. Wealthy Doc says:

    Getting your mind straight is hugely important. I grew up poor and among small-minded limited-thinking people everywhere. I was told all the things I wouldn’t have and could never do. Fortunately, I read and read and read. Think and Grow Rich. The Power of Positive Thinking. Psychocybernetics, As a Man Thinketh, etc. Later I read Grit and about a Growth Mindset. That thinking made all the difference.

  4. Mindset and cultivating good habits. Put it on autopilot!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.